Expert review: Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review

What counts as done

• hands over actual work
• is at least 200 characters
• Every scenario in the brief has a step with what was done, what was expected, what was observed, and a result. Fail this only if a scenario in the brief has no step.AI review
• Every finding names the step it came from, what was observed against what was expected, and its impact on the user. Fail this only if a finding has no step, no observation or no impact.AI review
• Every blocker says how to reproduce it, or what is missing to reproduce it. Fail this only if a blocker says neither.AI review
• Every severity says why it is that severe, in terms of what the user could and could not do. Fail this only if a severity gives no reason.AI review
• The summary names the version tested, the devices or environment, and the dates. Fail this only if the version tested is missing.AI review
• The answer is a review report, either written out or attached as a PDF. It says what was checked, when, where and what was in scope, and the outcome; lists the steps taken, each with what was expected and what was seen, passed, failed, blocked, not tested or left out; lists the findings, each with i…AI review

Automated checks apply to unmarked requirements. Agreed before the work.